Microsoft�s heavily-rumored mini-tablet (link) was a no-show at the Surface event this week. If this had been an Apple announcement, I�d just say the Internet got carried away with itself. But the source of the rumors was the very reliable Mary Jo Foley at ZDNet (link), who�s almost a house organ for Microsoft official leaks. So what happened?
It�s possible that Microsoft leaked the rumors deliberately in order to smoke out Foley�s sources, but I don�t think Microsoft would have put Qualcomm in the story if that were the case. Most likely the product was real, and the announcement was canceled just recently.
Bloomberg says Microsoft execs Stephen Elop and Satya Nadella lost confidence in the product and decided to pull it at the last minute (link). That would be a typical move for a new management team � you always look to kill a few of your predecessor�s projects to put your own stamp on the organization. The reasoning that Bloomberg gave didn�t make sense, though. The report says the mini-tablet was canceled because it didn�t have enough differentiation. A tablet optimized for note-taking and equipped with a stylus would have been heavily differentiated, so that doesn�t wash.
More believable would be if the company is leery of launching any new product that depends on Windows RT, the ARM-based version of Windows that can�t run normal Windows apps. RT has failed to achieve significant momentum in the market, and I could see Elop and Nadella being very cautious about risking another RT-based product flop. More prudent to pull it now, ship the Intel-based jumbo Surface tablet, and do a minitablet later, if at all, based on Windows Phone. The jumbo product won�t change the world, but at least it won�t embarrass Microsoft.
If that was the call, it�s a prudent decision that totally misreads the market for mobile devices. RT was a bad choice for full-sized Surface tablets because they are too close in price and size to notebooks. No Windows user wants a notebook that won�t run Windows apps. But a minitablet could have been sold as an information appliance, for which full Windows app compatibility is much less important.
This situation illustrates why the tech industry has so much trouble creating truly new device categories. Small startups have trouble scraping together the money necessary to do a really different product. Doing it right often takes on the order of $20 million, more than you can easily raise from VCs or Kickstarter. Big companies have that sort of money, but they�re usually risk averse and would rather stick to established categories of product. Which is what Microsoft just did.
Ah well, the net impact is that Microsoft has now whiffed twice on the minitablet market, once with the twin-screen Courier product and now Surface mini. I wonder if they�ll get a third chance.
I�ll also be interested to see what the last-minute cancellation costs Microsoft. If they were close to launching, there will be parts and manufacturing contracts with big cancellation fees. Presumably Nadella will be doing some sort of restructuring of the company in the near future � new CEOs always do � and the writedown, if any, can be buried in that.
Meanwhile, someone at Microsoft is probably sitting on a roomful of Surface Mini prototypes that are headed to a shredder. I have one humble request: Could you please slip one of them to me?
Emoticon